2

Asked by Blakhitman on this post

How about if you're counting squares (area of a graph), I seem to suck at doing that. Is there more lenience in that instance?

This is with respect to questions (on VCE Physics mainly) that have an answer that involves counting squares on a graph.

flag

2 Answers

1

its normally if you count all the squares with more than half showing under the graph then it should be ok.

link|flag
1

I would actually take the precision of counting each square to the closest tenth of a square. For example, I'd look at a square and say: "...that's about 0.4 of a square"

One really effective way of doing this is to just count the full squares first, write that down, then try to match the incomplete squares together to build 1 (i.e: one that looks like a 0.6 and one that looks like a 0.4) and then with the leftovers, just add up the decimal points.

This is the most surefire way to get an accurate answer, and a rule of thumb like "counting it if it's showing at least half" can be very inaccurate for some curves and graphs.

I've heard they can actually be pretty tight about this (they want maybe within 10% of some number that VCAA decided was 'correct' or something), so that means you actually have to be quite accurate at square counting. With the tips above you can be accurate as well as speedy.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.